Dimana Tempat Sewa Sound System di Kali Baru Jakarta
Dimana Tempat Sewa Sound System di Kali Baru Jakarta Hubungi : 0812 9133 1086 atau 0818 0833 0038 RAZQA SOUND adalah sebuah jasa pelayanan sewa yang bergerak di bidang jasa sewa soundsystem. Kami melayani berbagai kebutuhan anda, seperti: pernikahan, khitanan, arisan, ulang tahun, peresmian perusahaan, acara pentas seni sekolah dan acara-acara lain nya baik diluar ruangan (outdoor) maupun yang di dalam ruangan Dimana Tempat Sewa Sound System di Kali Baru Jakarta
Dimana Tempat Sewa Sound System di Kali Baru Jakarta Jika anda yang membutuhkan Jasa Sewa Soundsystem, Jasa Kebutuhan Event dan Jasa Keperluan Pesta, silahkan menghubungi kami dan dapatkan penawaran harga terbaik dari kami. Kami akan memberikan harga yang murah, serta pelayanan terbaik bagi konsumen, karena senyum pelanggan adalah kebanggaan kami. Dimana Tempat Sewa Sound System di Kali Baru Jakarta
DEALER RESMI ISUZU ONLINE ISUZU GIGA, ELF NKR NHR MICROBUS, PANTHER GRAND TOURING, BISON, D MAX - DEALER RESMI ISUZU
Kami Dealer Isuzu melayani penjualan: Bekasi, Karawang, Cikarang dan Luar Daerah. Kami adalah distributor dan dealer resmi m
Kami Dealer Isuzu melayani penjualan: Bekasi, Karawang, Cikarang dan Luar Daerah. Kami adalah distributor dan dealer resmi mobil dan truk Isuzu terbesar di Indonesia, IAMI Astra Grup, menjual kendaraan merk Isuzu semua tipe Truk Elf & ELF Microbus, Truk Isuzu GIGA/ Medium Truk, Minibus Panther, Pick Up, Bison, dan D-Max,dengan layanan purna jual terbaik,Program Astra World, harga kompetitif, pembelian cash dan kredit dengan uang muka & angsuran ringan, semua model dan tipe karoseri.Kami juga menjual kendaraan Isuzu niaga untuk transportasi dan distribusi angkutan barang ( Comercial Vehicle ) dengan harga kompetitif
Ada 5 Alasan, Anda Harus Bersepeda
saco-indonesia.com, Mungkin saat ini, lari, baik
joging maupun maraton, tengah menjadi olahraga yang digandrungi banyak orang.
Saco-Indonesia.com — Mungkin saat ini, lari, baik joging maupun maraton, tengah menjadi olahraga yang digandrungi banyak orang. Tak masalah sih untuk ikut melakukan olahraga ini. Tetapi, jika Anda bukan tipe orang yang kuat lari jauh, coba saja olahraga yang lain, salah satunya bersepeda. Sama seperti lari, bersepeda juga punya manfaat kesehatan untuk tubuh Anda kok. Berikut beberapa alasan Anda harus menjajal olahraga ini.
1. Menguatkan kaki
Saat bersepeda, kaki pasti lebih banyak berperan. Dengan olahraga ini, Anda bisa membentuk otot kaki, paha, dan perut sekaligus. Kekuatan otot tubuh ini juga akan memengaruhi kekuatan jantung Anda.
2. Membuat wajah lebih cerah
Bersepeda juga punya manfaat untuk kulit Anda, lho. Dengan bersepeda, sirkulasi darah dan metabolisme akan berjalan lancar. Ini berarti sirkulasi oksigen dan nutrisi yang dikirim ke sel kulit akan berjalan lebih cepat. Akibatnya, wajah akan terlihat lebih bersinar dan segar. Tak cuma itu, bersepeda juga akan membantu pelepasan endorfin yang bisa membuat Anda jadi lebih tenang dan santai.
3. Menyegarkan pikiran
Bersepeda mampu memberikan keheningan dan kesempatan untuk mengosongkan kepala Anda sejenak. Apalagi yang lebih menenangkan selain bersepeda santai sambil menghirup udara segar dan berjemur di bawah hangatnya sinar matahari?
4. Membuat awet muda
Sebuah penelitian yang dilakukan oleh King College, London, menemukan bahwa orang yang gemar bersepeda ternyata bisa terlihat tetap awet muda. Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap pasangan kembar identik dan membagi mereka ke dalam dua kelompok, rutin bersepeda dan tidak bersepeda.
Hasilnya, orang yang rutin bersepeda tiga kali seminggu selama 45 menit terbukti terlihat lebih muda sembilan tahun secara biologis dibandingkan dengan kembarannya yang tak berolahraga.
5. Siapa tahu bertemu jodoh?
Olahraga ini biasanya lebih diminati pria daripada perempuan. Rasio pesepeda pria dan perempuan berkisar 3:1. Nah, siapa tahu Anda bertemu dengan teman baru atau bahkan calon pasangan di komunitas bersepeda yang Anda ikuti. Menyenangkan, kan?
Advertisement Politics Obama Finds a Bolder Voice on Race Issues
As he reflected on the festering wounds deepened by race and grievance that have been on painful display in America’s cities lately, President Obama on Monday found himself thinking about a young man he had just met named Malachi.
A few minutes before, in a closed-door round-table discussion at Lehman College in the Bronx, Mr. Obama had asked a group of black and Hispanic students from disadvantaged backgrounds what could be done to help them reach their goals. Several talked about counseling and guidance programs.
“Malachi, he just talked about — we should talk about love,” Mr. Obama told a crowd afterward, drifting away from his prepared remarks. “Because Malachi and I shared the fact that our dad wasn’t around and that sometimes we wondered why he wasn’t around and what had happened. But really, that’s what this comes down to is: Do we love these kids?”
Many presidents have governed during times of racial tension, but Mr. Obama is the first to see in the mirror a face that looks like those on the other side of history’s ledger. While his first term was consumed with the economy, war and health care, his second keeps coming back to the societal divide that was not bridged by his election. A president who eschewed focusing on race now seems to have found his voice again as he thinks about how to use his remaining time in office and beyond.
In the aftermath of racially charged unrest in places like Baltimore, Ferguson, Mo., and New York, Mr. Obama came to the Bronx on Monday for the announcement of a new nonprofit organization that is being spun off from his White House initiative called My Brother’s Keeper. Staked by more than $80 million in commitments from corporations and other donors, the new group, My Brother’s Keeper Alliance, will in effect provide the nucleus for Mr. Obama’s post-presidency, which will begin in January 2017.
“This will remain a mission for me and for Michelle not just for the rest of my presidency but for the rest of my life,” Mr. Obama said. “And the reason is simple,” he added. Referring to some of the youths he had just met, he said: “We see ourselves in these young men. I grew up without a dad. I grew up lost sometimes and adrift, not having a sense of a clear path. The only difference between me and a lot of other young men in this neighborhood and all across the country is that I grew up in an environment that was a little more forgiving.”
Organizers said the new alliance already had financial pledges from companies like American Express, Deloitte, Discovery Communications and News Corporation. The money will be used to help companies address obstacles facing young black and Hispanic men, provide grants to programs for disadvantaged youths, and help communities aid their populations.
Joe Echevarria, a former chief executive of Deloitte, the accounting and consulting firm, will lead the alliance, and among those on its leadership team or advisory group are executives at PepsiCo, News Corporation, Sprint, BET and Prudential Group Insurance; former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell; Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey; former Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.; the music star John Legend; the retired athletes Alonzo Mourning, Jerome Bettis and Shaquille O’Neal; and the mayors of Indianapolis, Sacramento and Philadelphia.
The alliance, while nominally independent of the White House, may face some of the same questions confronting former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton as she begins another presidential campaign. Some of those donating to the alliance may have interests in government action, and skeptics may wonder whether they are trying to curry favor with the president by contributing.
“The Obama administration will have no role in deciding how donations are screened and what criteria they’ll set at the alliance for donor policies, because it’s an entirely separate entity,” Josh Earnest, the White House press secretary, told reporters on Air Force One en route to New York. But he added, “I’m confident that the members of the board are well aware of the president’s commitment to transparency.”
The alliance was in the works before the disturbances last week after the death of Freddie Gray, the black man who suffered fatal injuries while in police custody in Baltimore, but it reflected the evolution of Mr. Obama’s presidency. For him, in a way, it is coming back to issues that animated him as a young community organizer and politician. It was his own struggle with race and identity, captured in his youthful memoir, “Dreams From My Father,” that stood him apart from other presidential aspirants.
But that was a side of him that he kept largely to himself through the first years of his presidency while he focused on other priorities like turning the economy around, expanding government-subsidized health care and avoiding electoral land mines en route to re-election.
After securing a second term, Mr. Obama appeared more emboldened. Just a month after his 2013 inauguration, he talked passionately about opportunity and race with a group of teenage boys in Chicago, a moment aides point to as perhaps the first time he had spoken about these issues in such a personal, powerful way as president. A few months later, he publicly lamented the death of Trayvon Martin, a black Florida teenager, saying that “could have been me 35 years ago.”
That case, along with public ruptures of anger over police shootings in Ferguson and elsewhere, have pushed the issue of race and law enforcement onto the public agenda. Aides said they imagined that with his presidency in its final stages, Mr. Obama might be thinking more about what comes next and causes he can advance as a private citizen.
That is not to say that his public discussion of these issues has been universally welcomed. Some conservatives said he had made matters worse by seeming in their view to blame police officers in some of the disputed cases.
“President Obama, when he was elected, could have been a unifying leader,” Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, a Republican candidate for president, said at a forum last week. “He has made decisions that I think have inflamed racial tensions.”
On the other side of the ideological spectrum, some liberal African-American activists have complained that Mr. Obama has not done enough to help downtrodden communities. While he is speaking out more, these critics argue, he has hardly used the power of the presidency to make the sort of radical change they say is necessary.
The line Mr. Obama has tried to straddle has been a serrated one. He condemns police brutality as he defends most officers as honorable. He condemns “criminals and thugs” who looted in Baltimore while expressing empathy with those trapped in a cycle of poverty and hopelessness.
In the Bronx on Monday, Mr. Obama bemoaned the death of Brian Moore, a plainclothes New York police officer who had died earlier in the day after being shot in the head Saturday on a Queens street. Most police officers are “good and honest and fair and care deeply about their communities,” even as they put their lives on the line, Mr. Obama said.
“Which is why in addressing the issues in Baltimore or Ferguson or New York, the point I made was that if we’re just looking at policing, we’re looking at it too narrowly,” he added. “If we ask the police to simply contain and control problems that we ourselves have been unwilling to invest and solve, that’s not fair to the communities, it’s not fair to the police.”
Moreover, if society writes off some people, he said, “that’s not the kind of country I want to live in; that’s not what America is about.”
His message to young men like Malachi Hernandez, who attends Boston Latin Academy in Massachusetts, is not to give up.
“I want you to know you matter,” he said. “You matter to us.”
But an unusual assortment of players, including furniture makers, the Chinese government, Republicans from states with a large base of furniture manufacturing and even some Democrats who championed early regulatory efforts, have questioned the E.P.A. proposal. The sustained opposition has held sway, as the agency is now preparing to ease key testing requirements before it releases the landmark federal health standard.
The E.P.A.’s five-year effort to adopt this rule offers another example of how industry opposition can delay and hamper attempts by the federal government to issue regulations, even to control substances known to be harmful to human health.
Formaldehyde is a known carcinogen that can also cause respiratory ailments like asthma, but the potential of long-term exposure to cause cancers like myeloid leukemia is less well understood.
The E.P.A.’s decision would be the first time that the federal government has regulated formaldehyde inside most American homes.
“The stakes are high for public health,” said Tom Neltner, senior adviser for regulatory affairs at the National Center for Healthy Housing, who has closely monitored the debate over the rules. “What we can’t have here is an outcome that fails to confront the health threat we all know exists.”
The proposal would not ban formaldehyde — commonly used as an ingredient in wood glue in furniture and flooring — but it would impose rules that prevent dangerous levels of the chemical’s vapors from those products, and would set testing standards to ensure that products sold in the United States comply with those limits. The debate has sharpened in the face of growing concern about the safety of formaldehyde-treated flooring imported from Asia, especially China.
What is certain is that a lot of money is at stake: American companies sell billions of dollars’ worth of wood products each year that contain formaldehyde, and some argue that the proposed regulation would impose unfair costs and restrictions.
Determined to block the agency’s rule as proposed, these industry players have turned to the White House, members of Congress and top E.P.A. officials, pressing them to roll back the testing requirements in particular, calling them redundant and too expensive.
“There are potentially over a million manufacturing jobs that will be impacted if the proposed rule is finalized without changes,” wrote Bill Perdue, the chief lobbyist at the American Home Furnishings Alliance, a leading critic of the testing requirements in the proposed regulation, in one letter to the E.P.A.
Industry opposition helped create an odd alignment of forces working to thwart the rule. The White House moved to strike out key aspects of the proposal. Subsequent appeals for more changes were voiced by players as varied as Senator Barbara Boxer, Democrat of California, and Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, as well as furniture industry lobbyists.
Hurricane Katrina in 2005 helped ignite the public debate over formaldehyde, after the deadly storm destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of homes along the Gulf of Mexico, forcing families into temporary trailers provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The displaced storm victims quickly began reporting respiratory problems, burning eyes and other issues, and tests then confirmed high levels of formaldehyde fumes leaking into the air inside the trailers, which in many cases had been hastily constructed.
Public health advocates petitioned the E.P.A. to issue limits on formaldehyde in building materials and furniture used in homes, given that limits already existed for exposure in workplaces. But three years after the storm, only California had issued such limits.
Industry groups like the American Chemistry Council have repeatedly challenged the science linking formaldehyde to cancer, a position championed by David Vitter, the Republican senator from Louisiana, who is a major recipient of chemical industry campaign contributions, and whom environmental groups have mockingly nicknamed “Senator Formaldehyde.”
By 2010, public health advocates and some industry groups secured bipartisan support in Congress for legislation that ordered the E.P.A. to issue federal rules that largely mirrored California’s restrictions. At the time, concerns were rising over the growing number of lower-priced furniture imports from Asia that might include contaminated products, while also hurting sales of American-made products.
Maneuvering began almost immediately after the E.P.A. prepared draft rules to formally enact the new standards.
White House records show at least five meetings in mid-2012 with industry executives — kitchen cabinet makers, chemical manufacturers, furniture trade associations and their lobbyists, like Brock R. Landry, of the Venable law firm. These parties, along with Senator Vitter’s office, appealed to top administration officials, asking them to intervene to roll back the E.P.A. proposal.
The White House Office of Management and Budget, which reviews major federal regulations before they are adopted, apparently agreed. After the White House review, the E.P.A. “redlined” many of the estimates of the monetary benefits that would be gained by reductions in related health ailments, like asthma and fertility issues, documents reviewed by The New York Times show.
As a result, the estimated benefit of the proposed rule dropped to $48 million a year, from as much as $278 million a year. The much-reduced amount deeply weakened the agency’s justification for the sometimes costly new testing that would be required under the new rules, a federal official involved in the effort said.
“It’s a redlining blood bath,” said Lisa Heinzerling, a Georgetown University Law School professor and a former E.P.A. official, using the Washington phrase to describe when language is stricken from a proposed rule. “Almost the entire discussion of these potential benefits was excised.”
“That’s a huge difference,” said Luke Bolar, a spokesman for Mr. Vitter, of the reduced estimated financial benefits, saying the change was “clearly highlighting more mismanagement” at the E.P.A.
The review’s outcome galvanized opponents in the furniture industry. They then targeted a provision that mandated new testing of laminated wood, a cheaper alternative to hardwood. (The California standard on which the law was based did not require such testing.)
But E.P.A. scientists had concluded that these laminate products — millions of which are sold annually in the United States — posed a particular risk. They said that when thin layers of wood, also known as laminate or veneer, are added to furniture or flooring in the final stages of manufacturing, the resulting product can generate dangerous levels of fumes from often-used formaldehyde-based glues.
Industry executives, outraged by what they considered an unnecessary and financially burdensome level of testing, turned every lever within reach to get the requirement removed. It would be particularly onerous, they argued, for small manufacturers that would have to repeatedly interrupt their work to do expensive new testing. The E.P.A. estimated that the expanded requirements for laminate products would cost the furniture industry tens of millions of dollars annually, while the industry said that the proposed rule over all would cost its 7,000 American manufacturing facilities over $200 million each year.
“A lot of people don’t seem to appreciate what a lot of these requirements do to a small operation,” said Dick Titus, executive vice president of the Kitchen Cabinet Manufacturers Association, whose members are predominantly small businesses. “A 10-person shop, for example, just really isn’t equipped to handle that type of thing.”
Big industry players also weighed in. Executives from companies including La-Z-Boy, Hooker Furniture and Ashley Furniture all flew to Washington for a series of meetings with the offices of lawmakers including House Speaker John Boehner, Republican of Ohio, and about a dozen other lawmakers, asking several of them to sign a letter prepared by the industry to press the E.P.A. to back down, according to an industry report describing the lobbying visit.
The industry lobbyists also held their own meeting at E.P.A. headquarters, and they urged Jim Jones, who oversaw the rule-making process as the assistant administrator for the agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, to visit a North Carolina furniture manufacturing plant. According to the trade group, Mr. Jones told them that the visit had “helped the agency shift its thinking” about the rules and how laminated products should be treated.
The resistance was particularly intense from lawmakers like Mr. Wicker of Mississippi, whose state is home to major manufacturing plants owned by Ashley Furniture Industries, the world’s largest furniture maker, and who is one of the biggest recipients in Congress of donations from the industry’s trade association. Asked if the political support played a role, a spokesman for Mr. Wicker replied: “Thousands of Mississippians depend on the furniture manufacturing industry for their livelihoods. Senator Wicker is committed to defending all Mississippians from government overreach.”
Individual companies like Ikea also intervened, as did the Chinese government, which claimed that the new rule would create a “great barrier” to the import of Chinese products because of higher costs.
Perhaps the most surprising objection came from Senator Boxer, of California, a longtime environmental advocate, whose office questioned why the E.P.A.’s rule went further than her home state’s in seeking testing on laminated products. “We did not advocate an outcome, other than safety,” her office said in a statement about why the senator raised concerns. “We said ‘Take a look to see if you have it right.’ ”
Safety advocates say that tighter restrictions — like the ones Ms. Boxer and Mr. Wicker, along with Representative Doris Matsui, a California Democrat, have questioned — are necessary, particularly for products coming from China, where items as varied as toys and Christmas lights have been found to violate American safety standards.
While Mr. Neltner, the environmental advocate who has been most involved in the review process, has been open to compromise, he has pressed the E.P.A. not to back down entirely, and to maintain a requirement that laminators verify that their products are safe.
An episode of CBS’s “60 Minutes” in March brought attention to the issue when it accused Lumber Liquidators, the discount flooring retailer, of selling laminate products with dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The company has disputed the show’s findings and test methods, maintaining that its products are safe.
“People think that just because Congress passed the legislation five years ago, the problem has been fixed,” said Becky Gillette, who then lived in coastal Mississippi, in the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and was among the first to notice a pattern of complaints from people living in the trailers. “Real people’s faces and names come up in front of me when I think of the thousands of people who could get sick if this rule is not done right.”
An aide to Ms. Matsui rejected any suggestion that she was bending to industry pressure.
“From the beginning the public health has been our No. 1 concern,” said Kyle J. Victor, an aide to Ms. Matsui.
But further changes to the rule are likely, agency officials concede, as they say they are searching for a way to reduce the cost of complying with any final rule while maintaining public health goals. The question is just how radically the agency will revamp the testing requirement for laminated products — if it keeps it at all.
“It’s not a secret to anybody that is the most challenging issue,” said Mr. Jones, the E.P.A. official overseeing the process, adding that the health consequences from formaldehyde are real. “We have to reduce those exposures so that people can live healthy lives and not have to worry about being in their homes.”
Kami menyediakan berbagai macam paket penyewaan sound system yang dapat SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA menyesuaikan kebutuhan acara anda. Paket sewa sound system tersebut dapat digunakan untuk indoor, outdoor dan juga panggung.SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA Jika anda membutuhkan spesifikasi di luar paket, silahkan menghubungi kami langsung,SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA dan akan kami berikan solusi terbaik untuk acara anda.
Sewa Rental Sound System
Mackie,Mic Shure,Mixer Yamaha. Tepat Waktu,Hemat & Berkualitas
Map of Sewa sound system jakarta Sewa Sound System
Agen Persewaan sound system
JL. BATU AMPAR III NO.22A KELURAHAN CONDET BATU AMPAR
KEC. KRAMAT JATI
JAKARTA TIMUR 081291331086
Petunjuk arah Sewa Sound System
Tidak ada ulasan · Toko Alat-Alat
JL. BATU AMPAR III NO.22A KELURAHAN CONDET BATU AMPAR
KEC. KRAMAT JATI
JAKARTA TIMUR · 081291331086
Tempat yang lain Harga Sewa Sound System Jakarta
Kami menyediakan harga paket sewa sound system terbaik, sewa alat musik band, akustik, studio musik dan studio rekaman.SEWA SOUND SYSTEM DI JAKARTA, BEKASI DAN Cari Rental Sewa Speaker, Sound System 3000 - 50000 watt murah, SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA di Jakarta, depok, bekasi dan sekitarnya? Hub FAJAR 081291331086. Sewa Sound System Jakarta menyediakan Sewa panggung rigging, Sewa sound system jakarta, Sewa HT Murah, Sewa Lighting Panggung, Sewa Multimedia, Jasa .Daftar harga sewa sound system Harga sewa sound system. Harga sewa Razqa Sound System 0818-0833-0038 , 0812-9133-1086, Pin BB: 75812D47. Sewa Sound System Sewa Sound System, SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA Lighting, Band, Organ Tunggal, Jakarta system, sewa lighting, sewa band, sewa organ tunggal, dan sewa DJ di condet, Jakarta, .
layanan jasa sewa rental peralatan sound system, mixer, lighting, alat band dan multimedia SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA untuk konser musik, konser perayaan natal, pameran, seminar dan SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA Sewa Sound System Jakarta.Harga Sewa Sound System Rental Bekasi & Jakarta Harga Sewa Rental Sound System Per 1.000 watt SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA .Rental Sound System Jakarta Raya, Bekasi, Tangerang, Bogor, Serpong.Sewa Sound System Online Sewa SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTASound System Online Terbaik Di Jakarta. SEWA SOUND SYSTEM JAKARTA Hubungi : 0818-0833-0038 , 0812-9133-1086, Pin BB: 75812D47. Rental Sound System Jakarta Rental Sound System Jakarta.